County officials ask voters to support tax
by Courtney Coble, Staff Writer and Sally Maxwell, Managing Editor
5 months ago | 758 views | 20 20 comments | 1 1 recommendations | email to a friend | print
How Sequoyah County’s jail will be funded will be decided in a special election Tuesday as Sequoyah County voters cast their ballots for or against a half-cent sales tax for jail operations and maintenance and the sheriff’s office.

Sequoyah County Commissioners voted at a special meeting in August to turn county jail operations over to Sheriff Ron Lockhart and also called for the vote on a half-cent sales tax, which will go to the sheriff to operate the jail.

If the half-cent sales tax fails, county officials say property owners will most likely bear the financial burden of jail operations. County commissioners have said that, with no money to operate the jail, prisoners will have to be housed in other county jails, and the county will face lawsuits filed by prisoners. If the lawsuit outcomes go against the county, the amount awarded in the lawsuits will go onto ad valorem taxes automatically.

The jail was previously operated by a trust authority, which is now dormant. When county commissioners noted that the state was reducing the number of Department of Corrections inmates housed in county jails — thus reducing the amount of money the county raised by housing DOC prisoners — they turned over the jail to the sheriff. By doing so, the one-sixth of a cent already in place for the jail remained in place. The commissioners determined that if county prisoners were housed in other county jails, the county would lose that one-sixth of a cent sales tax. Also, turning over the jail allowed county money to be used for its operations. The jail trust authority could not use county money to operate the jail.

If the sales tax passes, it will save property owners from the possible increase on their ad valorem taxes, and would shift the tax to everyone who comes into the county to purchase merchandise. That half-cent sales tax is predicted to bring in about $1.4 million a year, Lockhart said.

Sheriff asks for support

“We need the tax to pass,” Lockhart said Thursday.

Lockhart said the jail can be run three ways — through the sheriff’s department, by the criminal justice authority or by housing prisoners in other facilities.

“To house inmates in other facilities, it will cost more money then keeping the jail open,” Lockhart said.

He said state law requires the county have jail facilities.

“We can either pass the tax and keep the jail here or we will have to pay other counties to house our prisoners, which will cost more money,” Lockhart said. “The tax will bring in about $1.4 million. The burden will be taken off of the county budget.”

Sheriff’s budget

Lockhart explained that the new jail has never been an item in the county budget. It ran under the criminal justice authority based on the one-sixth sales tax and money paid by the state for house DOC prisoners. The jail was not funded by county money, Lockhart said.

“I guess they had money saved, plus they had the DOC prisoners,” Lockhart said. “About a year ago they quit shipping as many DOC inmates.

“The sheriff’s department has always had the same budget, about $598,000, that is for the dispatch center, maintenance, operation, fuel and etc.,” Lockhart said.

He said the county is proposing $9,000 more dollars then what the sheriff’s department had last year to run both operations — the jail and the sheriff’s office.

“There is no way to do it,” Lockhart said. “When we first got the jail there was $4,000 in the account for the jail. The first five months (of 2009) to operate the jail the figures came to $112,000 a month.”

Lockhart said the city of Sallisaw has a $1.6 million budget for their police department alone.

“They got less then 45 square miles to cover with 22 officers. We got 673 square miles to cover with nine road deputies with a $382,000 budget,” Lockhart said.

“The rural citizens need to get out and vote for this tax. It’s going to hurt them more the citizens in town because they have their own police department; the rural citizens don’t. It’s a shame these rural citizens will let the citizens in Sallisaw regulate what they are going to get. That is why it is so important for the rural citizens to get out and vote yes for this tax,” Lockhart said.

The tax benefit

County Clerk Vicki Sawney said, “The ad valorem taxes will eventually go up if the tax is not passed.”

She said the county will not be able to pay the bills and vendors will file suit against the county. When the suits are filed the vendors will receive a judgment from the suit for the amount owed and that amount will go into a sinking fund, which is paid through the ad valorem taxes.

“The property owners in the city and the county will be supporting the jail,” Sawney said.

“With the sales tax,” Sawney said, “the tax will be spread out over a wider area. People who come into the county to purchase items will pay the tax, not just Sequoyah County property owners.”

Sawney said 35 to 40 percent of the taxes are collect from people who don’t live in the county.

Sawney said, “The tax rate would go from 9.417 percent to 9.917 percent in Sallisaw. It won’t be a noticeable difference. But if it has to come out of the ad valorem taxes it will be noticeable to the property owners.

“With the 9.417 percent sales tax (in Sallisaw) we have now if a person was to spend $127 on items at Walmart the tax would make the total bill $138.95.”

She said with the increased one-half-cent tax the total bill would equal $139.59.

“That would be a 64-cent increase,” Sawney said.

Sheriff’s new vehicles

“I’m not overspending,” Lockhart said about new equipment recently purchased for the sheriff’s office.

“We’ve spent $38,000 since Jan. 1 on buying used vehicles. That money came from our cash account. Nothing we have bought has come out of the general funds.

“In January we filled for a grant for equipment through the Justice Department. We were approved. We bought new vehicles and equipment.”

Lockhart applied for and was awarded a JAG (Justice Assistance Grant) through the U.S. Department of Justice, which he said is an equipment grant. He said they were approved for the grant and the sheriff’s office received $92,000 to help with the purchase of equipment.

“This did not cost the taxpayers one dime,” Lockhart said. “No money from the county budget has been used.

“I met my budget, I didn’t overspend, not one penny,” Lockhart said. “I’ve been working hard on trying to get grants. My goal is to leave the sheriff’s office in better shape then what it was in when I took office. I will apply for every grant I can to help this sheriff’s office be top notch.”
comments (20)
« countrygirl12 wrote on Friday, Oct 16 at 11:51 AM »
County unemployment jumps to 10.3 percent

03.26.09 - 01:57 pm

Sequoyah County unemployment jumped from 6.6 percent in December to 10.3 percent in January, according to information released by the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission (OESC).

The OESC reports that the county had a total work force of 18,190 in January, with 16,310 working and 1,880 unemployed. The 10.3 percent unemployment rate ties Sequoyah County with LeFlore County in the percentage of unemployed. The 10.3 percent is the fifth highest unemployment rate in the state. Tillman County has the highest unemployment for January, at 11.5 percent.

The unemployment rate for January in neighboring counties is Adair County, 9.1 percent; Haskell County, 7.3 percent; Muskogee County, 7.2 percent; and Cherokee Country, 5.9 percent.

Sequoyah County’s unemployment is almost 4 percentage points higher than one year ago, in January 2008, when unemployment was at 6.4 percent.

Oklahoma’s unemployment for January was reported at 5.6 percent by the OESC, and unemployment across the United states for the same month was reported at 8.5 percent.

« Guy Thomas wrote on Tuesday, Oct 13 at 08:39 PM »
Good ole Bud Tate from topix.com...

I have to give kudos to you. You are one independent person. You generate your own power, you supply your own water, you have a garden....which exempts you from an electric and water bills. Your screen name is feduptaxpayer and you talk like you totally live off the grid, free from civilization. And you gripe about taxes?? Oh yeah, I forgot to mention the tax PASSED. I guess you and the rest of the self centered bunch of idiots here really worked hard to getting this tax to fail. Look at the results lady, you and your opposition just got blown out of the water. How do you like those apples ?
« feduptaxpayer wrote on Tuesday, Oct 13 at 08:24 PM »
Well, Guy Thomas... If you are so concerned with real names, here is mine. My name is Janice Tate. My husband Bud and I live in the Lake Tenkiller area. We are both retired and we live quite well, thanks to a lot of planning ahead. We generate our own electricity from two windmills on our property which supplies us with enough electricity that we do not have to depend on an outside source. We also have two wells on our property which supplies us with enough water that we also do not have to rely on an outside source for our water.

We also have quite a large garden area which supplies us with all the vegetables we need. I do a lot of canning and freezing vegetables. We have a hog and a calf slaughtered every fall which gives us plenty of meat to eat for the year. Very little do we ever have to buy at the grocery store. When we do have to shop, we do all our shopping either in Tahlequah or Muskogee because things are a lot less expensive in Tahlequah and Muskogee than they are in Sallisaw. Now, is there anything else you would like to know?
« Guy Thomas wrote on Tuesday, Oct 13 at 05:51 PM »
It's pathetic when some people think they're going to make a point, but in reality all they're going to make is a mistake.

I guess within a few hours now, we're going to find out how many sane people voted.

You know with the many comments that's posted on this website, rarely ever do I see any who uses their real names. I'm beginning to wonder if there is either legal reasons, or personal reasons behind it.

« wakeuptime wrote on Tuesday, Oct 13 at 04:44 PM »
I also voted NO and so did ALL my relatives and I have a lot of relatives.
« Guy Thomas wrote on Tuesday, Oct 13 at 03:35 PM »
Corrected as you are wakeuptime, a Lockhart did indeed get busted in the ring first. Point is, why was it the feds that got to them first ?

And no I haven't been promised a job, nor do I think I want one considering being in my late 50's.

I voted yes and I encourage everyone else to vote yes.
« marylee wrote on Tuesday, Oct 13 at 02:37 PM »
I voted, and the answer was NO
« anonymous wrote on Tuesday, Oct 13 at 12:06 PM »
GO VOTE NO GET THE WORD OUT FOR PEOPLE TO VOTE NO GRAB THAT PHONE BOOK AND MAKE SOME CALLS AND LET PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT THE SCAM THE COUNTY IS TRYING OT PULL AND LET THEM KNOW THEY SHOULD VOTE NO
« feduptaxpayer wrote on Tuesday, Oct 13 at 09:05 AM »
It's election day people. Let's get to the polls and VOTE NO on both questions. Don't let a little rain stop you from casting your NO VOTE. VOTE NO ON ANY NEW SALES TAXES OR ANY NEW PROPERTY TAXES.... VOTE NO !!!!!!!
« anonymous wrote on Tuesday, Oct 13 at 07:12 AM »
It's pretty apparent that some people aren't understanding exactly where the sheriff has been getting the money for new vehicles etc. The sheriff has applied for grants for new vehicles, uniforms, etc. And those grants have to be used just that..... nothing else. Same as the sales tax we are ask to vote yes on ... it has to be used for the jail and the sheriff added on the sheriffs dept to the ballot to ensure that once the tax is passed the jail stays in his possession and under his control . And if they try to take the jail back under the jail authority they lose the 1/2 cent sales tax completely. I voted yes as well as alot of other people yesterday and i pray this tax passes so we can get rid of those Tulsa county prisoners and focus on running our jail self sufficiently. The jail as it stands now is overcrowded due to housing the Tulsa county prisoners which means less local inmates are being kept there.
« wakeuptime wrote on Monday, Oct 12 at 09:16 PM »
Another thing Guy Thomas... Your comment about Johnny Philpot's relatives being busted for being part of a drug ring.... Well guess what... If my memory serves me right, it was a Lockhart that got busted first and this Lockhart was part of the Philpot's relative's drug ring. Now, what say ye????? Just one big happy family. Philpots and Lockharts.
« wakeuptime wrote on Monday, Oct 12 at 09:08 PM »
You are one funny person, Guy Thomas. Did Lockhart promise you a job? That is par for the course for the Lockharts. When Lockhart's old Uncle Sam ran for sheriff I think he promised every body in Sequoyah County a job. Before that, it was money he dished out for the votes. But that is water under the bridge. I am concerned with what is taking place now and something needs to be done with the crooked corrupt way this county is being run. Not just the sheriff but ALL elected officials.

I am sick and tired of all the lies and the game playing the elected officials are doing. The corrupt elected officials are trying to con the tax paying citizens of Sequoyah County in any way they can.

If the county officials want more money then I suggest they do as any of the rest of us would have to do if we were short of money and could not pay our bills. Cut back on their frivolous spending. Even County Commissioner Steve Carter said there was frivolous spending taking place at the county level.

I will be VOTING NO tomorrow on all questions. I have had enough of their lies and con games. I ALSO WANT THE ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS [$100,000.00] OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY RETURNED.

Plus, I do not like the way the county assessor is trying to CON people into thinking that if the people vote to do away with the personal property tax that it will be saving the taxpayer money. Just how stupid does she think we are. I urge the people to VOTE NO on that piece of SCAM WORK also. I have never seen so many crooks in one place in my entire life as there is at the Sequoyah County courthouse. TAXPAYERS, I URGE YOU TO PLAY IT SMART AND VOTE NO TOMORROW.

GET OUT AND VOTE REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE WEATHER IS AND VOTE NO. IT IS TIME WE TOOK OUR COUNTY BACK !!!!!! VOTE NO !!!!!!
« Guy Thomas wrote on Monday, Oct 12 at 07:02 PM »
You're so right....Johnny Philpot never asked for anything. Oh, but he was sure to keep a low profile when his mexican in-law got busted by the feds. Hmmm...I wonder why ? His words, "I don't get involved with family", spoken like the true crook he was.

Oh the brutality was amongst his reputation, that and downing a bottle. His name has been on plenty of lawsuits. So yeah I'd say he done his fair share of damage.

Johnny never asked for grants or anything because he really didn't care. He didn't care anything about improvement. He managed to get his friend an office job, whose salary was more than the deputies.

Oh the list can go on and on if you feel like discussing the old sheriff. Alot of people can talk all the talk they want about the new sheriff, at least he's trying to make changes. That's better than a good ole boy just sitting around collecting a county check and only being a sheriff around election time...only it didn't work for him this time did it ?

I voted for Lockhart and I will vote yes for the tax. It's not for Lockhart, it's for the jail and the sheriffs department. Somewhere down the line I think everyone forgot that the taxpayers are what keeps the deputies jobs up. It keeps the sheriffs job up. Do you want to destroy it all because in your individual opinion, the sheriff has wasted money. Money has to be spent, not just to sit and look at. Vehicles were needed and more deputie were needed. If you can't understand that then you must be hating the sheriff too much.

If you vote no tomorrow, and this tax doesn't pass. There will be no scare tactics. There's going to be chaos and you will reap what you sow.
« fun4all wrote on Monday, Oct 12 at 06:48 PM »
VOTE NO TOMORROW, LET'S TAKE OUR AUTHORITY BACK AND SHOW THESE PEOPLE THEY WORK FOR US. And while we are at it, let's demand our $100,000 tax money back and request an investigation into the missing money
« fun4all wrote on Monday, Oct 12 at 06:45 PM »
Apparently anonmyous, you didn't read the news story where the sheriff stated he spent $38,000 on USED vehicles from the general fund. So where do you suppose the general fund comes from? It comes from the taxpayers. VOTE NO TOMORROW
« feduptaxpayer wrote on Monday, Oct 12 at 05:45 PM »
Please go to the polls and VOTE NO tomorrow. Don't let a little rain keep you from voting. You know the greedy money hungary ones will be out voting for the extra taxes, rain or not. We Taxpayers can do the same. So, let's make a difference and let our voices be heard loud and clear. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. NO MORE NEW TAXES......VOTE NO ON ALL QUESTIONS.
« voteno wrote on Monday, Oct 12 at 04:27 PM »
We had a sheriff that ran this office for years that never asked the public for money!!! He did a mighty fine job with out needing money!!! You people voted this new sheriff in because he told you he would do this and that for Sequoyah County and all he has done is spent money on things his officers did not need!!! New cars, new badges, new uniforms because he wants to be just like Sebastian County!!! THIS IS NOT SEBASTIAN COUNTY!!! He wanted the jail and knew it was going to take money to run it let him figure out what hes going to do by himself!!!! I hope you people are happy with what YOU voted in as sheriff!!! I feel sorry for the officers that have to work for him!!! Our sheriff department was ran just fine until he took office I wish he would take his scare tactics and GO!!!! VOTE NO!!!
« ruralresident wrote on Monday, Oct 12 at 03:20 PM »
Is there grants out there for the jail that would solve this issue ? I know there is grants out there for everything else ,I will be voting NO on the tax that they are wanting passed hope the county people will come togather and do the same we just can't afford it.
« bobcatbob wrote on Monday, Oct 12 at 03:03 PM »
County Clerk Vicki Sawney said, “The ad valorem taxes will eventually go up if the tax is not passed.”

If I was County Clerk Vicki Sawney I would be too embarrassed to say one word about wanting more money from the taxpayers, seeing as she is the one responsible for keeping records of where and how the taxpayers money is spent. Maybe she should do her job and find the $100,000.00 that she let come up missing out of the County Clerk's office instead of trying to use "scare tactics" to try and bilk the taxpayers out of more money for her to "lose"????

Sounds as though the county officials are still using the old "scare tactics" and putting the "cart before the horse." Instead of them whining and crying about wanting MORE money from the taxpayers for them to "lose", let them hunt down the $100,000.00 of the taxpayers money that is "missing." Now that is something they should be whining and crying about. They can't keep up with the money they already had so why give them more taxpayers money to "lose"??? I WILL BE VOTING NO ON ALL QUESTIONS AND I ENCOURAGE ALL OTHERS DO THE SAME. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.... VOTE NO.
« ruralresident wrote on Monday, Oct 12 at 02:41 PM »
Well its all good and well understood that the Sheriffs office needs the money , but you no I live in rural county area and I never see any law enforcement any way what about us citizens that the officers not really care about and what about the ones that can't afford for these taxes to be raised anyway it goes tomorrow it aint going to change the fact that these officers are not going to be around anyway , I have seen them sitting around talking to the local law enforcment sitting in several different cars and then I go on about my business and when I leave the groc store and head home they are all still sitting around talking , another thing is why not use the money from the drug raids and conficated items to put the money to the jail, all I no is that it is all a way to get more money that people can't afford my self I will start doing my business else where in like Fort smith or musgokee at least one thing the taxes wont be that high and if property taxes go up so be it I will still pay mine cause I ain't gong to lose my property it will be took care of , besides i don't lock my doors or veichle doors at night because we have a good niegbor hood but with all the worrys about this tax crap who knows there will probaly be alot of theives get started just so they can make it on every day living , It's sad but it's all over the world right now not just in our county besides I thot the tax is for the Jail not the Sheriffs office,

The Sequoyah County Times offers readers the ability to post comments about news stories appearing on sequoyahcountytimes.com. There is no guarantee of anonymity. Post your comments knowing that your name may one day be released under judicial or other circumstances. Your TIMES will not modify your comments posted to the web, but if they contain personal attacks, profanity, or other degrading comments, we can, at our sole discretion, delete them, even if most of the comment makes a good point. Comments unrelated to the story will be deleted. Click here to read the complete user agreement.